Organic Food Vs. Non - organic Food – A New Age Argument

Organic Food Vs. Non - organic Food – A New Age Argument

Tried a few years ago, there were a limited number of categories for food: there was food according to taste ( sweet, sour, biting, bitter ) and there was food according to what it is made of ( meat, fruit, vegetable, fish ). In recent years, however, a new group was introduced, that is, food according to how it is made. With this, the phrase “organic foods” comes into the picture.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture ( USDA ), organic foods are those foods that are made or grown without the use of pesticides, artificial fertilizers, growth hormones or any form of biotechnology. They are those foods that grow at a natural velocity, are plucked when ripe and are taken as is. In peculiarity, non - organic foods are those that are grown for application consumption and are ergo aided by pesticides, artificial fertilizers, growth hormones and biotechnology to grow faster, become plumper and come more appetizing. In line with this new distinction among foods, a new age argument has ( literally ) been placed on the moveable feast: which is better, organic food vs. non - organic food?
Powerful arguments support each side. For those who believe that organic food is better than non - organic food, they put together to the impression that all the pesticides, artificial fertilizers and chemical enhancers that go into non - organic foods are the motive overdue many human ailments and diseases. While this thesis can be backed up by some research, this research is still not conclusive and and so cannot sometime be considered as gospel. In addition, those who are supporters of organic food also pride themselves in the detail that creating organic foods is far less esteemed and friendlier to the environment. For those who do not believe in buying organic food, they stress on the points of organic food being far more inestimable to purchase and much harder to keep since of the deficiency of preservatives. They bank on previous studies linking organic foods to no more health benefits than non - organic foods and they also point to the truth that organic foods are not necessarily 100 % free of affected additives as the USDA bland permits the use of some chemicals in growing them.
Because research on the puzzle has not after all wholly been verified, the difference between organic and non - organic foods rests primarily in one’s arbitration; at basic for now. What scientists and most doctors are advocacy people to do is, rather than focusing on how healthy organic foods might be compared to non - organic foods, they should take a closer look at their daily diets and tap the health of their lifestyles from there. It is uttered that it happens all too often these days that people preoccupy over organic foods and fundamentally have diets loaded with artificial relish, trans fats and clear sugars, i. e. debris. Before joining in on the argument of organic foods vs. non - organic foods, one wish first make the necessary changes in one’s diet in series to be able to call oneself truly healthy and health - conscious. As for organic foods vs. non - organic foods, let that be the alongside step.